District Court, D. Nevada, 2023

Kalenowski v. City of Las Vegas

Kalenowski v. City of Las Vegas
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided November 7, 2023
Kalenowski v. City of Las Vegas

Trial Court Opinion

1 LYSSA S. ANDERSON Nevada Bar No. 5781 KRISTOPHER J. KALKOWSKI Nevada Bar No. 14892 KAEMPFER CROWELL 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 650 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Telephone: (702) 792-7000 Fax: (702) 796-7181 [email protected] [email protected] Attorneys for Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department Brian Fortner, Jordan Miller, and Marcus Martin UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA MICAH D. KALENOWSKI , Case No.: 2:20-cv-01743-GMN-VCF Plaintiff, STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO vs. FILE A REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THE MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CITY OF LAS VEGAS, NEVADA, et al. [ECF Nos. 103, 104, 105, 106] Second Request 14 Defendants.

15 Defendants Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Brian Fortner, Jordan Miller, and Marcus Martin (collectively, “LVMPD Defendants”), through their counsel, Kaempfer Crowell, and Plaintiff Micah D. Kalenowski, through his counsel, McAvoy Amaya & Revero, stipulate and agree to extend the current deadline of November 8, 2023, for LVMPD Defendants to file a Reply in support of their Motions for Summary Judgment, (ECF Nos. 103, 104, 105, 106), by nine days, which will create a new deadline of November 17, 2023.

21 1. On September 13, 2023, LVMPD Defendants filed their Motions for Summary Judgment, (ECF Nos. 103, 104, 105, 106).

23 2. The parties entered into a Stipulation to extend Plaintiff’s Response deadlines and ensuing Reply deadlines, (ECF No. 110), which the Court granted on September 28, 2023, (ECF No. 113), making new deadlines for Responses of October 18, 2023, and for Replies of November 8, 2023.

3 3. Plaintiff timely filed Responses by the October 18, 2023, deadline.

4 4. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b) and Local Rule IA 6-1 impose a good cause standard to extend the deadline file Replies. “‘Good cause’ is a non-rigorous standard that has been construed broadly across procedural and statutory contexts.” Ahanchian v. Xenon Pictures, Inc., 624 F.3d 1253, 1259 (9th Cir. 2010).

8 5. Good cause exists to extend the deadline for LVMPD Defendants to file their Replies by nine days in light of LVMPD Defendants’ counsel briefly being ill and a recently demanding litigation schedule in other matters.

11 6. An extension of time will ensure that the Court has appropriate briefing before making a ruling. Neither party will suffer prejudice from an extension of time.

13 DATED this 6th day of November, 2023.

14 KAEMPFER CROWELL McAVOY AMAYA & REVERO By: /s/ Lyssa S. Anderson By: /s/. Michael J. McAvoyamaya LYSSA S. ANDERSON MICHAEL J. McAVOY-AMAYA 16 Nevada Bar No. 5781 Nevada Bar No. 14082 KRISTOPHER J. KALKOWSKI TIMOTHY E. REVERO 17 Nevada Bar No. 14892 Nevada Bar No. 14603 1980 Festival Plaza Drive, Suite 650 400 S. 4th St., Ste. 500 18 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Attorneys for Defendants Attorneys for Plaintiff 19 Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Brian Fortner, Jordan 20 Miller, and Marcus Martin 21 IT IS SO ORDERED.

22 DATED this ___7____ day of November, 2023.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.