Shi v. Paysign, Inc.
Shi v. Paysign, Inc.
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA ‘ ne ook ok 5 ‘ In re Paysign, Inc. Securities Litigation, Case No. 2:20-cv-00553-GMN-DJA
7 Order 8 9 10 Before the Court is the parties’ stipulation to stay “all litigation deadlines.” (ECF No. 61). 11 || The parties explain that they have reached an agreement to settle and wish to stay the deadlines in 12 || the case while they prepare their settlement documents. The only deadlines currently active in the 13 || case are discovery deadlines set in the parties’ scheduling order. (ECF No. 50). The Court thus 14 || construes the parties’ stipulation as one to stay discovery—not to stay the entire case—and grants 15 || the parties’ stipulation. The Court finds a stay of discovery appropriate under the good cause 16 || analysis in Schrader v. Wynn, No. 2:19-cv-02159-JCM-BNW,
2021 WL 4810324, at *4 (D. Nev. 17 |} Oct. 14, 2021) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1. 18 19 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the parties’ stipulation to stay discovery (ECF No. 20 || 61) is granted. This order does not stay the case. It only stays the deadlines in the parties’ 21 || scheduling order. 22 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties must file their motion for preliminary 23 || approval of the settlement or a joint status report explaining what is impeding settlement and how 24 || or if the Court can assist on or before December 15, 2023. 25 26 DATED: November 16, 2023 ) . 27 OK XN DANIEL J. ALBREGTS \ 28 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Reference
- Status
- Unknown