District Court, D. Nevada, 2024

Moosman v. Frontier Airlines, Inc.

Moosman v. Frontier Airlines, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided August 16, 2024
Moosman v. Frontier Airlines, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA EDRINNA MOOSMAN, ) 4 ) Plaintiff, ) Case No.: 2:24-cv-00720-GMN-EJY vs. ) 6 ) ORDER ADOPTING FRONTIER AIRLINES, INC., et. al., ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 7 ) Defendants. ) ) 9 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), (ECF No. 10), from United States Magistrate Judge Elayna Youchah, which recommends dismissing Plaintiff’s complaint because she failed to plead federal question or diversity jurisdiction and had three opportunities to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, but failed to do so.

13 A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo determination of those portions to which objections are made if the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations concern matters that may not be finally determined by a magistrate judge. D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 22 140, 149 (1985) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s R&R where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir. 2003).

25 Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. (See R&R, ECF 1 10) (setting August 12, 2024, deadline for objections).

2 Accordingly, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 10), is |} ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.

5 The Clerk of Court is kindly requested to close the case.

6 Dated this 16 day of August, 2024.

Y, . Mh Glory M. Navarro, District Judge 9 infos District Court Page 2 of 2

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.