Zito v. United States Supreme Court

3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 kee 6 JORDAN ZITO, e¢ al., Case No. 3:24-cv-00295-MMD-CLB 7 Plaintiffs, ORDER 3 V. 9 UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, et 10 Defendants.

12 This matter is referred to the Court for the limited purpose of determining whether || in forma pauperis status should continue on appeal. (ECF No. 9.) The Court certifies that || any in forma pauperis appeal from its order of dismissal would be frivolous or would not || be taken “in good faith” under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Plaintiff's in forma pauperis status || should thus be revoked on appeal. See Hooker v. American Airlines, 302 F.3d 1091, 1092 || (9th Cir. 2002) (finding that revocation of forma pauperis status is appropriate where || district court finds the appeal to be frivolous).

19 DATED THIS 28" Day of August 2024.

20 ALA 21 MIRANDAM.DU.

29 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE