District Court, D. Nevada, 2024

Coffey v. United States Government

Coffey v. United States Government
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided September 25, 2024
Coffey v. United States Government

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA MICHAEL COFFEY ) 4 ) Plaintiff, ) Case No.: 2:24-cv-01304-GMN-BNW vs. ) 6 ) ORDER ADOPTING UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT ) REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 7 ) Defendant. ) ) 9 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), (ECF No. 7), from United States Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler, which recommends that this action be dismissed for failure to comply with a court order.

12 A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo determination of those portions to which objections are made if the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations concern matters that may not be finally determined by a magistrate judge. D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 21 140, 149 (1985) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s R&R where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir. 2003).

24 Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. (See R&R, ECF No. 7) (setting a September 23, 2024, deadline for objections).

1 Accordingly, 2 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 7), is || ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full.

4 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice.

5 ||The Clerk of Court is kindly requested to close out this case.

6 ||Dated this 24th day of September, 2024.

7 [FU Gloria M.JNavarro, District Judge 8 Unite tes District Court Page 2 of 2

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.