Tanner v. Clark County School District

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA OTIS LEE TANNER. et al., 4 Case No. 2:24-cv-01841-JAD-NJK Plaintiffs, 5 Order v. CLARK COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et al., 8 Defendants.

9 Otis Lee Tanner brought this lawsuit on behalf of his minor child, O.T. Docket No. 1 at 6.

10] An attorney has not appeared on behalf of Plaintiffs. The Ninth Circuit has held that a parent or 11] guardian cannot litigate a case on behalf of a minor child without retaining a lawyer. Johns v. 12] Cnty. of San Diego, 114 F.3d 874, 877 (9" Cir. 1997).! Accordingly, Plaintiffs must retain a 13] lawyer and that lawyer must file a notice of appearance by November 4, 2024. Failure to comply 14]| with this order may result in dismissal of the representative claims. See Johns, 114 F.3d at 877.

15 IT IS SO ORDERED. oe 16 Dated: October 3, 2024 JAS a, Nancy J. Koppe 18 United States Magistrate Judge ' The same is true in Nevada state court, see Williams v. State, 480 P.3d 269 (Nev. App. 28] 2021) (unpublished), where this case was initially filed.