Flynn v. Williams

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA DAWNYELL FLYNN, Case No.: 2:24-cv-00563-APG-BNW 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 13] DETECTIVE TODD WILLIAMS, et al., 7 Defendants 8 On September 23, 2024, Magistrate Judge Weksler recommended that I dismiss this case 9] without prejudice because plaintiff Dawnyell Flynn did not file an amended complaint by the given deadline. ECF No. 13. Flynn did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (‘the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations 15}| de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)).

16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Weksler’s report and recommendation 17|| (ECF No. 13) is accepted and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.

19 DATED this 10th day of October, 2024.

20 Z a ANDREWP.GORDON.

CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE