Vandenbergen v. Doyle

3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA MICHAEL C. VANDENBERGEN, Case No. 2:24-cv-00875-ART-DJA 6 Plaintiff, ORDER (ECF No. 5) 7 BEATRIZ J. DOYLE; ET AL., 8 Defendant.

10 Plaintiff Michael Vandenbergen filed a pro se suit against invisible || Defendants who seek to harm him. Magistrate Judge Albregts denied □□□□□□□□□□□ || application to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) and provided him ninety days to || re-submit his application or a filing fee. (ECF No. 5.) Plaintiff did not do so.

14 || Magistrate Judge Albregts then issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R) || recommending dismissal without prejudice. Plaintiff did not object or file || anything further with the Court.

17 The Court adopts the R&R in full and dismisses the action without || prejudice. The Court is not required to “review... any issue that is not the || subject of an objection” to an R&R. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985); see, || e.g., United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir. 2003). Plaintiff || has not objected to the R&R. 22 The Court adopts the R&R (ECF No. 4) in full, dismisses □□□□□□□□□□□ || complaint (ECF No.1) without prejudice, and instructs the Clerk to close the case.

25 DATED THIS 29th day of October 2024.

26 eset de 27 ANNE R. TRAUM 28 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE