1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7 U.S. EQUAL EMPLOYMENT OPPORTUNITY COMMISSION, Case No. 2:23-cv-01307-GMN-NJK Plaintiff(s), Order V. [Docket No. 36] chal AURANT SERVICES, 12 Defendant(s). 13 Pending before the Court is the EEOC’s motion to compel discovery. Docket No. 36. The 14] motion relates to discovery propounded ten months ago, responses provided nine months ago, and a meet-and-confer that appears to have run its course more than five months ago. See, e.g., Docket 16] No. 36 at 4. No explanation is provided as to how this motion is timely given the pertinent 17] considerations. See, e.g., Herndon v. City of Henderson,

, 1247-48 (D. Nev. 18] 2020).! Accordingly, the motion to compel is DENIED without prejudice. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: October 30, 2024 21 4. A — a Nancy J. Ko 22 United States Magistrate Judge 23 24 25 26 27), ——__________ ' The Court may sua sponte raise the potential untimeliness of a motion to compel. Garcia 28] y. Serv. Emps. Int’l Union,

, 354 n.2 (D. Nev. 2019).