Miao v. Caie Foods Partnership, Ltd.
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 kkK* 4 Al HUA MIAO, et al., Case No. 3:22-CV-00463-ART-CLB 5 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO 6 WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL V. [ECF No. 56] 7 CAIE FOODS PARTNERSHIP, LTD., et al., Defendants.
10 Before the Court is Flynn Giudici, PLLC’s (“Flynn Giudici”) motion to withdraw as 11 counsel for Defendants Caie Foods Partnership, Ltd. and Caie Foods Production, LLC, | (collectively “Defendants”). (ECF No. 56.)
13 No opposition was filed, and Flynn Giudici certifies that the motion to withdraw was served on Defendants by Certified U.S. mail and e-mail. (/d. at 5.) Good cause appearing, | the motion to withdraw, (ECF No. 56), is GRANTED. The Clerk shall update the docket | to reflect the following address for Defendants: 17 Caie Foods Partnership, Ltd. and Caie Foods Production, LLC c/o Caie George 18 1802A Brierley Way, #108 49 Sparks, NV 89434 The Clerk shall MAIL a copy of this order to Defendants at the above address.
1 Finally, Defendants are advised that the Ninth Circuit has held that a corporation and other unincorporated associations may only appear in federal court through an attorney. United States v. High Country Broadcasting Co., Inc., 3 F.3d 1244 (9! Cir. 1993); Licht v. America West Airlines, 40 F.3d 1058 (9"" Cir. 1994). Therefore, Defendants shall file a substitution of counsel on or before Friday, August 30, 2024.
26| DATED: July31,2024 * 28 UNITED STATES ‘MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.