District Court, D. Nevada, 2024

DuBose v. Hilton Grand Vacations Club, LLC

DuBose v. Hilton Grand Vacations Club, LLC
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided July 16, 2024
DuBose v. Hilton Grand Vacations Club, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA BARBARA DUBOSE, ) 4 ) Plaintiff, ) Case No.: 2:24-cv-00648-GMN-DJA vs. ) 6 ) ORDER ADOPTING R&R HILTON GRAND VACATIONS CLUB, ) LLC, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ) 10 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (R&R), (ECF No. 26), of United States Magistrate Judge Daniel J. Albregts, which recommends the Court deny Plaintiff’s motions to amend, (ECF No. 14), and remand, (ECF No. 13).

13 A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo determination of those portions to which objections are made. Id. The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge.

18 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 149 (1985) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s report and recommendation where no objections have been filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir. 2003).

24 Here, no objections to the R&R were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. (See Min. Order, ECF No. 26) (setting July 11, 2024, deadline for objections). The Court therefore |} ADOPTS the R&R in full.

2 Accordingly, 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 26), is || ADOPTED in full.

5 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Remand, (ECF No. 13), is DENIED.

6 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Motion to Amend, (ECF No. 14), is DENIED.

7 Dated this _16_ day of July, 2024.

8 Lp Yj, 5 Li lo Gloria M/ Navarro, District Judge 10 United s District Court Page 2 of 2

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.