Griffin v. Reade

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA TAMIERA HARRIS GRIFFIN, Case No.: 2:24-cv-01671-APG-MDC 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 4] LINDA READE, et al., 7 Defendants 8 On November 8, 2024, Magistrate Judge Couvillier recommended that I dismiss this case 9|| because plaintiff Tamiera Griffin has not paid the filing fee, filed a proper application to proceed forma pauperis, and did not respond to an order to show cause by the given deadline. ECF No. Griffin did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and 12}|recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is 14! made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the 15}| district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if 16}| objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)).

17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Couvillier’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 4) is accepted, and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case.

20 DATED this 2nd day of December, 2024.

21 OIA ANDREWP.GORDON.

3 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE