1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 * * *

4 RYAN RANDALL, Case No. 2:24-cv-00338-RFB-EJY

5 Plaintiff, REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 6 v.

7 LINQ SECURITY, LAS VEGAS POLICE,

8 Defendants.

9 10 This action commenced when Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, submitted a Complaint on 11 February 16, 2024, but did not file an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) or pay the 12 required filing fee for a civil action. ECF No. 1-1. On February 23, 2024, the Court issued an Order 13 giving Plaintiff through and including March 29, 2024 to file an IFP or pay the filing fee. ECF No. 14 2. The Court explained that if Plaintiff failed to comply with the Order it would recommend 15 dismissal of this action without prejudice. Id. at 2. As of the date of this Recommendation, Plaintiff 16 has not complied with the Court’s Order. 17 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this matter be dismissed without 18 prejudice for failure to comply with the Court’s Order. 19 Dated this 25th day of September, 2024.

20

21 ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 NOTICE 24 Under Local Rule IB 3-2, any objection to this Finding and Recommendation must be in 25 writing and filed with the Clerk of the Court within fourteen (14) days. The Supreme Court has held 26 that the courts of appeal may determine that an appeal has been waived due to the failure to file 27 objections within the specified time. Thomas v. Arn,

(1985). This circuit has also 1 and brief the objectionable issues waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order and/or appeal 2 factual issues from the order of the District Court. Martinez v. Ylst,

(9th Cir. 3 1991); Britt v. Simi Valley United Sch. Dist.,

, 454 (9th Cir. 1983).

4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27