District Court, D. Nevada, 2024

Randolph v. Baker

Randolph v. Baker
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided January 9, 2024
Randolph v. Baker

Trial Court Opinion

Rene L. Valladares Federal Public Defender Nevada State Bar No. 11479 *Shelly Richter Assistant Federal Public Defender California State Bar No. 343104 411 E. Bonneville Ave., Ste. 250 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 (702) 388-6577 [email protected] *Attorney for Petitioner Roger Randolph UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA Roger Randolph, 13 Case No. 2:18-cv-00449-RFB-VCF Petitioner, 14 Order v. Renee Baker, et al., 17 Respondents.

Upon review of the record filed for this habeas matter and petitioner’s unopposed motion, the Court notes the parties omitted the sealed hearing transcript for the state district court’s Young v. State, 102 P.3d 572 (Nev. 2004) hearing. ECF No. 80 at 13 n.2; Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, Rule 7; Nasby v. McDaniel, 853 F.3d 1049, 1052-54 (9th Cir. 2017) (remanding to the district court with instructions to consider the entire state court record).

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1. Within 45 days of the entry of this order, respondents must file with the Court either a supplemental “Exhibit 266,” consisting of the February 16 or 17, 1| | 2011, sealed hearing transcript in petitioner’s underlying state-court matter, or a notice indicating the sealed transcript is unavailable.

3 2. Petitioner will have 10 days after respondents file a response to this 4|| order to admit or deny the correctness of respondents’ filing.

5 IT IS SO ORDERED.

6 4 S 11 Dated: January 9, 2024.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.