Jiangxi Panda Fireworks Co., LTD v. Burda

1 JNOeDvaId Da OBNarE NToT.A 7 7L9O8W RY, ESQ.

2 [email protected] Gibson Lexbury LLP 4 3027 East Sunset Road, Suite 208 Las Vegas, Nevada 89120 5 Telephone 702.541.7888 Facsimile 702.541.7899 Attorneys for Defendants UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA JIANGXI PANDA FIREWORKS CO., LTD, a Case No.: 2:23-cv-01232-MMD-DJA Chinese entity; Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR STAY OF 12 v. DISCOVERY AND DISCOVERY- RELATED MOTIONS PENDING DOUGLAS BURDA, an individual; ADJUDICATION OF DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION KONCEPT LLC, a Nevada limited liability 14 (ECF NO. 62) company doing business as BURDA IP; ELISSA BURDA, an individual, RED APPLE FIREWORKS CO., LTD., a Nevada limited liability company; 1.4G HOLDINGS, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, 18 Defendants.

20 Plaintiff Jiangxi Panda Fireworks Co., Ltd. (“Plaintiff”), by and through its counsel Bayramoglu Law Offices LLC, and Defendants Douglas Burda, Koncept LLC, Elissa Burda, Red Apple Fireworks Co., Ltd., and 1.4g Holdings, LLC (“1.4g”; collectively “Defendants”), by and through their counsel Gibson Lexbury LLP, hereby stipulate to stay all discovery and discovery-related motions pending this Court’s decision on Defendants’ Motion to Compel Arbitration (ECF No. 62), including, without limitation, Plaintiff’s Emergency Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 54) and Defendant 1.4g’s Motion to Compel Plaintiff’s Responses to 28 1 || Defendant 1.4g’s First Set of Interrogatories (ECF No. 55).

2 Respectfully submitted this 20th day of March, 2024.

4 GIBSON LEXBURY LLP BAYRAMOGLU LAW OFFICES LLC JSs/ J.D. Lowry SS Shawn A. Mangan 6 JODI DONETTA LOWRY, ESO. SHAWN A. MANGANO, Eso.

Nevada Bar No. 7798 Nevada Bar No. 6730 7 [email protected] [email protected] 3027 East Sunset Road, Suite 208 NIHAT DENIZ BAYRAMOGLU, ESQ.

8 (702) 589-5872 Telephone Nevada Bar No. 14030 (702) 541-7899 Facsimile [email protected] 9 Attorneys for Defendants DAVID SILVER, Eso.

Nevada Bar No. 15641 10 [email protected] 1540 West Warm Springs Road, Suite 100 11 Henderson, Nevada 89014 Attorneys for Plaintiff 13 S = Having reviewed the parties’ stipulation (ECF No. 63), the Court notes that the parties have g8a 14 not cited the standard this Court employs in determining requests to stay discovery. See Gibson v. MGM International, No. 2:23-cv-00140-MMD-DJA, 2023 WL 4455726 (D. Nev. 3 I5 July 11, 2023). Nonetheless, given the parties agreement, the reasons set forth for that £2 16 agreement, and the considerations of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 1, the Court finds good Zor cause to stay discovery. = IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the stipulation to stay discovery (ECF No. 63) is = (18 granted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the hearing set for April 1, 2024 at 1:30 PM is 20 VACATED.

21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the two pending discovery motions (ECF Nos. 54 and 2 55) are denied without prejudice and with leave to re-file after the Court issues its decision on the motion to compel arbitration (ECF No. 62).

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, in the event this action continues in this Court after 24 decision on the motion to compel arbitration, the parties must file a stipulation regarding 25 discovery deadlines within fourteen days from the date ofthat decision.

DATED: 3/22/2024 oH 7 DANIEL J. ALBREGTS UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE