Coney v. Lozo

2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4|| William Coney, Case No. 2:23-cv-01645-CDS-EJY 5 Plaintiff Order Extending Deadlines V. 7|| Officer Michael Lozo, et al., 8 Defendants 10 After screening plaintiff William Coney’s complaint and application to proceed in forma 1]|| pauperis, Magistrate Judge Elayna Youchah issued an order and report and recommendation.

12|| ECF No. 9. Any objections to her findings were due by March 11, 2024. Id. Five days before this 13] deadline, the R@R served on Coney was returned by the U.S. Postal Service as “undeliverable — 14] unable to forward.” ECF No. 1L It is unclear whether Coney ever received the RGR.

15 The Clerk of Court is kindly instructed to distribute a copy of Judge Youchah’s order 16|| (ECF No. 9) pursuant to the NEF so that the law librarian may serve it upon Coney.

17|| Accordingly, the deadline for Coney to file any objections is extended to April 9, 2024. Failure 18]| to file an objection will result in me adopting the R@R without a de novo review. Schmidt v. 19]| Johnstone, 263 F. Supp. 2d 1219, 1226 (D. Ariz. 2003) (“[N]o review is required of a magistrate 20]| judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.”).

21 Alternatively, Coney may file an amended complaint to cure the deficiencies identified in 22|| the magistrate judge’s order. If Coney chooses to file an amended complaint, he must do so no later than April 19, 2024. / ) 24 Dated: March 26, 2024 Lf 25 Ko Ung States District Judge