Kirby v. Brietenbach
Trial Court Opinion
3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA JOHN EDWARD KIRBY, Case No. 3:24-cv-00002-ART-CSD 6 Petitioner, ORDER v. WARDEN BRIETENBACH, Respondents.
10 Petitioner John Edward Kirby, a pro se Nevada prisoner, commenced this habeas action by filing a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1-1). This habeas matter is before the Court for initial review under the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases,1 as well as consideration of Kirby’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 1-2) and Applications to Proceed in forma pauperis (ECF Nos. 5, 7).
16 Pursuant to Habeas Rule 4, the assigned judge must examine the habeas petition and order a response unless it “plainly appears” that the petitioner is not entitled to relief. See Valdez v. Montgomery, 918 F.3d 687, 693 (9th Cir. 2019).
19 This rule allows courts to screen and dismiss petitions that are patently frivolous, vague, conclusory, palpably incredible, false, or plagued by procedural defects.
21 Boyd v. Thompson, 147 F.3d 1124, 1128 (9th Cir. 1998); Hendricks v. Vasquez, 908 F.2d 490, 491 (9th Cir. 1990) (collecting cases).
23 Kirby challenges a conviction and sentence imposed by the Second Judicial District Court for Clark County (“state court”). State of Nevada v. Kirby, Case Nos. CR17-2061, CR18-0098, CR18-0091. On November 21, 2018, the state 1 All references to a “Habeas Rule” or the “Habeas Rules” in this order identify the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States District Courts.
1 court entered a judgment of conviction pursuant to guilty pleas for burglary, grand larceny, property value greater than $3,500 or greater, and possession of stolen motor vehicle, properly value greater than $3,500 or greater. The state court sentenced Kirby to an aggregate term of 56 to 144 months.
5 In December 2019, Kirby filed a state habeas petition and in December 2020, he filed a supplemental state habeas petition. The state court denied relief and the Nevada Court of Appeals affirmed the denial of relief on appeal. On January 2, 2024, Kirby filed his federal habeas petition. ECF No. 1-1. The Court instructed Kirby to file a complete IFP application or pay the filing fee. ECF No. 6. Although Kirby filed IFP applications, on February 22, 2024, he paid the filing fee. Accordingly, the Court denies Kirby’s IFP applications. ECF Nos. 5, 7.
12 Turning to Kirby’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No. 1-2) to assist him in this habeas action, there is no constitutional right to appointed counsel in a federal habeas corpus proceeding. See Luna v. Kernan, 784 F.3d 15 640, 642 (9th Cir. 2015) (citing Lawrence v. Florida, 549 U.S. 327, 336-37 (2007)).
16 However, an indigent petitioner may request appointed counsel to pursue that relief. See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). The decision to appoint counsel is generally discretionary. Id. (authorizing appointment of counsel “when the interests of justice so require”). But counsel must be appointed if the complexities of the case are such that denial of counsel would amount to a denial of due process, and where the petitioner is so uneducated that he or she is incapable of fairly presenting his or her claims. See La Mere v. Risley, 827 F.2d 622, 626 (9th Cir. 1987); Brown v. United States, 623 F.2d 54, 61 (9th Cir. 1980).
24 The Court finds that appointment of counsel in this case is in the interests of justice. Kirby’s petition may raise relatively complex issues and it is unclear whether he will be able to adequately articulate his claims in proper person with the resources available to him. Therefore, Kirby’s motion for appointment of counsel is granted.
1 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED: 2 1. Petitioner John Edward Kirby’s Applications to Proceed in forma 3 pauperis (ECF Nos. 5,7) are denied.
4 2. Petitioner’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 1-2) is granted.
5 3. The Federal Public Defender is provisionally appointed as counsel and 6 will have 30 days to undertake direct representation of Petitioner or to 7 indicate the office’s inability to represent Petitioner in these proceedings.
8 If the Federal Public Defender is unable to represent Petitioner, the 9 Court will appoint alternate counsel. The counsel appointed will 10 represent Petitioner in all federal proceedings related to this matter, 11 including any appeals or certiorari proceedings, unless allowed to 12 withdraw. A deadline for the filing of an amended petition and/or 13 seeking other relief will be set after counsel has entered an appearance.
14 The Court anticipates a deadline of approximately 60 days from entry of 15 the formal order of appointment.
16 4. Any deadline established and/or any extension thereof will not signify 17 any implied finding of a basis for tolling during the time period 18 established. Petitioner at all times remains responsible for calculating 19 the running of the federal limitation period and timely presenting 20 claims. That is, by setting a deadline to amend the petition and/or by 21 granting any extension thereof, the Court makes no finding or 22 representation that the petition, any amendments thereto, and/or any 23 claims contained therein are not subject to dismissal as untimely. See 24 Sossa v. Diaz, 729 F.3d 1225, 1235 (9th Cir. 2013).
25 5. The Clerk of the Court will file Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas 26 Corpus (ECF No. 1-1).
27 6. The Clerk of Court is directed to add Nevada Attorney General Aaron D.
28 Ford as counsel for Respondents and to provide Respondents an 1 electronic copy of all items previously filed in this case by regenerating 2 the Notice of Electronic Filing to the office of the AG only. Respondents’ 3 counsel must enter a notice of appearance within 21 days of entry of 4 this order, but no further response will be required from Respondents 5 until further order of the Court.
6 || The Clerk of Court is further directed to send a copy of this order to the pro se || Petitioner, the Nevada Attorney General, the Federal Public Defender, and the || CJA Coordinator for this division.
11 DATED THIS 27th day March 2024.
12 An vs lossd Jer 13 ANNE R. TRAUM 14 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.