Lampkin
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA Devin Lampkin, Case No.: 2:23-cv-001997-JAD-EJY 4 Petitioner v. Order Granting Motion for Appointment of Counsel High Desert State Prison, et al., [ECF No. 2] 7 Respondents 8 Pro se Petitioner Devin Lampkin filed this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for writ of habeas corpus,1 challenging his 2020 judgment of conviction after a guilty plea on seven counts of robbery with use of a deadly weapon, one count of burglary with use of a deadly weapon, and conspiracy to commit robbery. Lampkin also moves for appointment of counsel.2 I find that the appointment of counsel is in the interests of justice, so I provisionally appoint the Federal Public Defender to represent Lampkin in this case.
14 Discussion 15 Lampkin is currently serving a lengthy aggregate sentence term of 10 to 51 years. His petition raises relatively complex issues, including numerous claims of ineffective assistance of counsel and allegations that Lampkin did not have a fair trial. In addition, Lampkin has extensive learning disabilities, as shown at sentencing in state court, and a demonstrated inability to articulate all claims available to him. Lampkin is also financially eligible for appointment of counsel.3 Although he has paid the filing fee, he lacks the funds to afford counsel.4 ECF No. 1-1.
2 ECF No. 2.
23 3 18 U.S.C. § 3006A.
4 ECF No. 2.
1 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that: 2 1. Petitioner’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel [ECF No. 2] is GRANTED.
3 2. The Federal Public Defender is provisionally appointed as counsel and has until 4 May 2, 2024, to undertake direct representation of petitioner or to indicate the 5 office’s inability to represent him in these proceedings. If the Federal Public 6 Defender is unable to represent the petitioner, the court will appoint alternate counsel.
7 The attorney appointed will represent the petitioner in all federal proceedings related 8 to this matter, including any appeals or certiorari proceedings, unless allowed to 9 withdraw. A deadline for the filing of an amended petition or seeking other relief will 10 be set after counsel has entered an appearance. I anticipate setting the deadline for 11 approximately 90 days from entry of the formal order of appointment.
12 3. Any deadline established and/or any extension thereof will not signify any implied 13 finding of a basis for tolling during the time period established. Petitioner at all times 14 remains responsible for calculating the running of the federal limitation period and 15 timely presenting claims. That is, by setting a deadline to amend the petition and/or 16 by granting any extension thereof, I make no finding or representation that the 17 petition, any amendments thereto, and/or any claims contained therein are not subject 18 to dismissal as untimely.5 19 4. The Clerk of Court is directed to ADD Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General of the 20 State of Nevada, as counsel for respondents, and provide Respondents an electronic 21 copy of all items previously filed in this case by regenerating the notice of electronic 22 filing to the Office of the AG only. Respondents’ counsel must enter a notice of See Sossa v. Diaz, 729 F.3d 1225, 1235 (9th Cir. 2013). ] appearance within 21 days of entry of this order, but no further response will be 2 required from respondents until further order of the court.
3 5. The Clerk of Court is further directed to SEND a copy of this order to the pro se 4 petitioner, the Nevada Attorney General, the Federal Public Defender, and the CJA 5 Coordinator for this division, and PROVIDE the Federal Public Defender with 6 copies of all prior filings in this case by regenerating notices of electronic filing.
SDK more Oe 9 April 2, 2024
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.