Kohli v. Dayal
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5] ERIC KOHLI, Case No. 2:20-cv-00538-CDS-NJK 6 Plaintiff(s), Order Vv. [Docket No. 160] 8) AJAY G. DAYAL, et al., 9 Defendant(s).
10 Pending before the Court is Hutchison & Steffen’s motion to withdraw as counsel for 11} Defendants Quantified Investment Group, LLC and Quantified Capital Group, LLC. Docket No. 12] 160. For good cause shown, that motion to withdraw is GRANTED. Defendants Quantified 13] Investment Group, LLC and Quantified Capital Group, LLC are ORDERED to retain new 14] counsel, see, e.g., United States v. High Country Broad. Co., 3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th Cir. 1993), 15] and have that new counsel file a notice of appearance in this case by May 22, 2024. Failure to 16] comply with this order may result in case-dispositive sanctions.
17 The Clerk’s Office is INSTRUCTED to update the contact information for Defendants 18] Quantified Investment Group, LLC and Quantified Capital Group, LLC as stated at Docket No. 19] 160 at 5.
20 IT IS SO ORDERED.
21 Dated: April 22, 2024 22 7, ‘ NX Ae.
Nancy J. Koppe 23 United States Magistrate Judge
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.