1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA JAMAR HUNTER, Case No.: 2:24-cv-00269-APG-BNW 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 6] OFFICER D. WOOD P#17066, LVMPD, et al., 7 Defendants 8 9 On April 20, 2024, Magistrate Judge Weksler recommended that I dismiss this case without prejudice because plaintiff Jamar Hunter did not file an amended complaint by the given deadline. ECF No. 6. Hunter did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo 12}|review of the report and recommendation.

(b)(1) (requiring district courts to 13}| “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Weksler’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 6), and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to 19}! close this case. 20 DATED this Ist day of May, 2024. g-— 22 □ ANDREW P. GORDON 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE