1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 kee 4 MY-SON MCNAIR, Case No. 3:23-CV-00151-ART-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO EXTEN 6 V. TIME 7 CHARLES DANIELS, et a/., [ECF No. 34] 8 Defendants. 9 Before the Court is Plaintiff My-Son McNair’s (“McNair”) motion for a 45-day 10 | extension of time to file a response to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment. (ECF 11} No. 34.) McNair asserts that an extension of time is necessary because he has limited access to the law library due to his work schedule and the law library is not open on the weekend. (/d.) 14 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(A) the court may, for good 15 cause, extend time if a request is made before the original time expires. The good cause 16 | inquiry focuses primarily on the movant's diligence. DRK Photo v. McGraw-Hill Global 17 | Educ. Holdings, LLC,

(9th Cir. 2017). 18 Having reviewed the motion, the Court finds that good cause exists to warrant 19 granting an extension but finds that a 45-day extension is not warranted and instead will grant a 30-day extension. Accordingly, the motion, (ECF No. 34), is granted in part and 21 denied in part. McNair shall file his response to Defendants’ motion for summary 22 | judgment by no later than Monday, February 3, 2025. 23 DATED: January 2, 2025 24 » 25 26 UNITED STATES\MAGISTRATE JUDGE 27 28