Cook v. NV Unemployment Board of Review

District Court, D. Nevada

Cook v. NV Unemployment Board of Review

Trial Court Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA AARON COOK, Case No.: 2:24-cv-02280-APG-MDC 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 5] NV UNEMPLOYMENT BOARD OF REVIEW, 7 Defendant 8 9 On December 19, 2024, Magistrate Judge Couvillier recommended that I dismiss plaintiff Aaron Cook’s complaint without leave to amend in this court, but without prejudice to Cook 11}/refiling his case in state court. ECF No. 5. Cook did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to 12} conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made’); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

328 F.3d 1114, 1121

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings 16] and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Couvillier’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 5) is accepted, and plaintiff Aaron Cook’s complaint (ECF No. 1-1) is dismissed without leave to amend in this court, but without prejudice to Cook refiling his case in state court. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 21 DATED this 7th day of January, 2025. 22 23 ANDREW P. GORDON CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown