Steele v. Brown

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA ROBERT STEELE, Case No.: 2:24-cv-02307-APG-EJY 4 Plaintiff Order v. [ECF No. 3] BERT BROWN, et al., 7 Defendants 8 On December 13, 2024, Magistrate Judge Youchah recommended that I dismiss plaintiff Robert Steele’s complaint with prejudice and deny his application to proceed in forma pauperis 10} }as moot. ECF No. 3. Steele did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which 13} objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)).

16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Youchah’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 3) is accepted, and plaintiff Robert Steele’s complaint (ECF No. 1-1) is dismissed 18} with prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to enter judgment accordingly and to close this case.

20 DATED this 7th day of January, 2025.

21 OIE ANDREWP.GORDON. SS 3 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE