1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 SOLOMON ALFRED YARTEH, Case No.: 2:24-cv-02041-RFB-NJK 6 Plaintiff, Order Vv. [Docket No. 7] 8] UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 9 Defendant. 10 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's motion to compel. Docket No. 7. However, 11} Plaintiff's motion is premature as Defendant has not been served. See Docket. 12 Further, while the Court construes the filings of pro se litigants liberally, Blaisdell v. Frappiea,

(9th Cir. 2013), the Court is unable to discern what relief it is that 14] Plaintiff seeks through this filing. Additionally, in violation of the Local Rules, see Local Rule IC 15] 2-2(b), Plaintiff appears to seek multiple types of relief, including habeas corpus relief. Docket 16] No. 7 at 11. An application for a writ of habeas corpus must be filed in the district where the 17] petitioner is confined.

(a); see also Rumsfeld v. Padilla,

, 443 18] (2004). Here, Plaintiff is in custody at Strafford County Corrections in Dover, New Hampshire. 19] See Docket. The United States District Court for the District of Nevada is not the proper court for 20] Plaintiff to seek this form of relief. 21 Accordingly, the motion to compel is DENIED. Docket No. 7. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: January 14, 2025 Naney J Koppe- 25 United States ‘Magistrate Judge 26 27 28