Scott v. Quigley

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 kee 4 JAMES EDWARD SCOTT, Case No. 3:23-CV-00258-ART-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO 6 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 7 V. DR. QUIGLEY, et al., Defendants.

10 On December 20, 2024, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECI No. 30.) Plaintiff was given notice of the motion pursuant to the requirements of Klingel v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9'" Cir. 1988), and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9" Cil | 1998) (ECF No. 34). To date, Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition.

14 The Court will sua sponte grant Plaintiff one extension of time to February 18 | 2025, to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. No further extensions of | time shall be granted. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition, the motion will be submitted to | the court for decision.

18 IT IS SO ORDERED.

19 DATED: January 15, 2025 .

21 UNITED STATES\MAGISTRATE JUDGE