Ball v. Equifax Information Services

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA WILLIAM H. BALL, Case No. 2:24-cv-01449-GMN-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), ORDER v. 9| EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, 10 Defendant(s).

11 It appears that Plaintiff William H. Ball has failed to update his address. See, e.g., Ball v. 12|| Circa Hotel & Casino, LLC, Case No. 2:24-cv-01457-CDS-NJK, Docket No. 10 (D. Nev. Jan. 15, 13] 2025) (mail returned as undeliverable).! “A party, not the district court, bears the burden of 14] keeping the court apprised of any changes in his mailing address.” Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1441 (Oth Cir. 1988); see also in re Hammer, 940 F.2d 524, 526 (9th Cir. 1991). To that end, the 16] local rules require that litigants immediately file with the Court written notification of any change 17] of address, and expressly warn that failure to do so may result in case-dispositive sanctions. See 18] Local Rule IA 3-1.

19 Accordingly, Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a notice of changed address by February 5, 2025. FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THIS ORDER MAY RESULT IN 21] DISMISSAL.

22 IT IS SO ORDERED.

23 Dated: January 15, 2025 24 f, x Nancy J. Koppe\ 25 United States Magistrate Judge 27 ' Plaintiff has filed many other cases to which the undersigned is assigned. Although mail has not yet been returned as undeliverable in this case, it has been so returned in Plaintiffs other cases.