Ucharima Alvarado v. Western Range Association

1 THIERMAN BUCK LLP SALAHI PC LEAH L. JONES, Nev. Bar No. 13161 YAMAN SALAHI, ESQ. (Pro Hac Vice) [email protected] [email protected] 7287 Lakeside Drive 505 Montgomery Street, 11th Floor Reno, Nevada 89511 San Francisco, California 94111 Telephone: 775-284-1500 Facsimile: 775-703-5027 Tel: (415) 236-2352 FAIRMARK PARTNERS, LLP Attorneys for Plaintiff and the Putative Class JAMIE CROOKS, ESQ. (Pro Hac Vice) [email protected] FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP RUCHA DESAI, ESQ. (Pro Hac Vice) Rebecca Hause-Schultz, Pro Hac Vice [email protected] E-Mail: [email protected] 1825 7th Street NW, #821 Dennis Cuneo, Pro Hac Vice Washington, DC 20001 E-Mail: [email protected] David B. Witkin, Pro Hac Vice TOWARDS JUSTICE E-Mail: [email protected] DAVID H. SELIGMAN, ESQ. (Pro Hac 621 Capitol Mall, Suite 2400 Vice) Sacramento, California 95814 [email protected] Telephone: (916) 210-0400 ALEXANDER HOOD, ESQ. (Pro Hac Facsimile: (916) 210-0401 Vice) [email protected] LEWIS BRISBOIS PO Box 371680, PMB 44465 Ellen Jean Winograd (Nev. Bar No. 815) Denver, Colorado 80237 5555 Kietzke Lane, Suite 200 E-Mail: [email protected] Telephone: (775) 399-6377 Facsimile: (775) 827-9256 Attorneys for Defendant WESTERN RANGE ASSOCIATION [Additional Counsel on Next Page] 18 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA CIRILO UCHARIMA ALVARADO, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated; Case No. 3:22-cv-00249-MMD-CLB , ORDER GRANTING JOINT 22 v. STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO SET WESTERN RANGE ASSOCIATION, a BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ RESPONSIVE California non-profit corporation; ELLISON PLEADINGS RANCHING COMPANY, a Nevada corporation; JOHN ESPIL SHEEP CO., INC., a Nevada corporation; F.I.M. CORP., a Nevada corporation; THE LITTLE PARIS SHEEP COMPANY, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; BORDA LAND & SHEEP COMPANY, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; HOLLAND RANCH, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; NEED MORE SHEEP CO., LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; and FAULKNER LAND AND LIVESTOCK COMPANY, INC., an Idaho corporation, 5 .

FABIAN VANCOTT HOLLAND & HART LLP Scott M. Petersen Joshua M. Halen Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Tanner J. Bean 5470 Kietzke Lane, Suite 100 Email: [email protected] Reno, NV 89511 Kirsten R. Allen Email: [email protected] Cory A. Talbot, Pro Hac Vice S. State Street, Ste. 2300 [email protected] Salt Lake City, Utah 84111 April M. Medley, Pro Hac Vice [email protected] Bryan Dixon 222 S. Main Street, Suite 2200 Email: [email protected] Salt Lake City, Utah 84101 E. Bonneville Ave., Ste. 400 Las Vegas, NV 89101 Attorneys for Defendant The Little Paris Sheep Co., LLC Attorneys for Defendant Ellison Ranching Co. JERRY SNYDER LAW SIMONS HALL JOHNSTON PC Jerry M. Snyder Anthony L. Hall, Esq.

Email: [email protected] Email: [email protected] Plumb Ln. Duncan G. Burke, Esq.

Reno, NV 89509 Email: [email protected] Sierra Rose Dr. Attorneys for Defendants F.I.M. Corp., Need Reno, NV 89511 More Sheep Co., LLC, and Faulkner Land & Livestock Co. Attorneys for Defendants John Espil Sheep Co., Inc., Borda Land & Sheep Co., LLC, and Holland Ranch, LLC 1 Plaintiff Cirilo Ucharima Alvarado (“Plaintiff”) and Defendants Western Range Association, Ellison Ranching Co., John Espil Sheep Co., Inc., Borda Land & Sheep Co., LLC, Holland Ranch, LLC, F.I.M. Corp., Need More Sheep Co., LLC, Faulkner Land & Livestock Co., and The Little Paris Sheep Co., LLC, (collectively, “Defendants”), by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate to an alternative briefing schedule for Defendants’ Responsive Motion(s) to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, pursuant to Local Rules IA 6-2, LR 7-1, and LCR 45- 1.

8 1. Plaintiff filed his Third Amended Complaint on January 14, 2025. (ECF No. 254); 9 2. Defendants’ Responsive Motion(s) are currently due January 28, 2025. Fed. R. Civ. 10 P. 15(a)(3); 11 3. The Parties respectfully submit that setting an alternative briefing schedule is warranted due to the number of parties, the complexity of the issues, and the desire to avoid taxing the Court’s limited resources with unnecessary motion practice; 14 4. The Parties respectfully submit that setting an alternative briefing schedule will maximize efficiency and serve the interests of justice and judicial economy; 16 5. The Parties propose the following alternative briefing schedule: 17  Defendants’ Responsive Motion(s) deadline: February 11, 2025; 18  Plaintiff’s Opposition deadline: March 11, 2025; 19  Defendants’ Reply to Opposition deadline: March 25, 2025; 20 6. Further, the Parties propose that, if Defendants file more than one motion to dismiss, Plaintiff be permitted to file a single consolidated opposition brief to such motion(s), the length of which shall not exceed the combined maximum length that would have been allowable to Defendants under the local rules based on the number of motions filed.

24 7. This Stipulation is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay; 25 8. Nothing in this Stipulation, nor the fact of entering into same, shall be construed as a waiver of any claim or defense held by any party; 27 9. For all of the aforementioned reasons, the parties stipulate and request the Court issue an alternative briefing schedule for Defendants’ Responsive Motion(s) to Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint, as set forth herein.

4 Dated: January 17, 2025 SALAHI PC 5 /s/ Yaman Salahi YAMAN SALAHI, ESQ. (Pro Hac Vice) 6 [email protected] Montgomery Street, 11th Floor San Francisco, California 94111 8 Tel: (415) 236-2352 9 FAIRMARK PARTNERS, LLP JAMIE CROOKS, ESQ. (Pro Hac Vice) 10 [email protected] 1825 7th Street NW, #821 11 Washington, DC 20001 TOWARDS JUSTICE DAVID SELIGMAN, ESQ. (Pro Hac Vice) 14 [email protected] PO Box 371680, PMB 44465 15 Denver, Colorado 80237 Co-Lead Counsel for Plaintiff and the Putative 17 Class Dated: January 21, 2025 FISHER & PHILLIPS LLP /s/ David B. Witkin Rebecca Hause-Schultz, Pro Hac Vice 21 E-Mail: [email protected] Dennis Cuneo, Pro Hac Vice 22 E-Mail: [email protected] David B. Witkin, Pro Hac Vice 23 E-Mail: [email protected] Capitol Mall, Suite 2400 Sacramento, California 95714 25 Telephone: (916) 210-0400 Facsimile: (916) 210-0401 1 LEWIS BRISBOIS 2 /s/Ellen Jean Winograd Ellen Jean Winograd (Nev. Bar No. 815) 5555 Kietzke Lane, Suite 200 4 E-Mail: [email protected] Telephone: (775) 3099-6377 5 Facsimile: (775) 827-9256 6 Attorneys for Defendant Western Range Association FABIAN VANCOTT /s/ Tanner J. Bean Scott M. Petersen E-Mail: [email protected] Tanner J. Bean E-Mail: [email protected] Kirsten R. Allen E-Mail: [email protected] Bryan Dixon E-Mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant Ellison Ranching Co. JERRY SNYDER LAW /s/ Jerry M. Snyder Jerry M. Snyder E-Mail: [email protected] Attorneys for Defendants F.I.M. Corp., Need More Sheep Co., LLC, and Faulkner Land & Livestock Co. SIMONS HALL JOHNSTON PC /s/ Duncan G. Burke Anthony L. Hall, Esq.

E-Mail: [email protected] Duncan G. Burke, Esq.

E-Mail: [email protected] Sierra Rose Dr. Reno, Nevada 89519 Telephone: (775) 785-0088 Attorneys for Defendants John Espil Sheep Co., Inc., Borda Land & Sheep Co., LLC, and Holland 1 Ranch, LLC HOLLAND & HART LLP /s/ Cory A. Talbot 3 Joshua M. Halen E-Mail: [email protected] 4 Cory A. Talbot, Pro Hac Vice [email protected] 5 April M. Medley, Pro Hac Vice [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant The Little Paris Sheep 7 Co., LLC ORDER 10 Based on the stipulation of the parties, the Court finds good cause to modify the briefin || Schedule and structure as follows: 12 ° Defendants’ Responsive Motion(s) deadline: February 11, 2025; 13 ° Plaintiff's Opposition deadline: March 11, 2025; ° Defendants’ Reply to Opposition deadline: March 25, 2025; Further, if Defendants file more than one motion to dismiss, Plaintiff shall be permitted to file single consolidated opposition brief to such motion(s), the length of which shall not exceed th || combined maximum length that would have been allowable to Defendants under the local rule || based on the number of motions filed.

20 IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: January 22, 2025 TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE MIRANDA M. DU

JOINT STIPULATION TO SET BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’? RESPONSTVE □□ FADINGS LK