1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 CHRISTOPHER SINNARD, et al., 4 Plaintiffs, Case No.: 2:24-cv-01715-GMN-MDC 5 vs. 6 ORDER ADOPTING CLARK COUNTY SOCIAL SERVICES, et REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 7 al.,

8 Defendants. 9 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), (ECF No. 4), 10 from United States Magistrate Judge Maximiliano D. Couvillier III, which recommends that 11 Plaintiffs’ case be dismissed in its entirety for failure to file new in forma pauperis (“IFP”) 12 applications or pay the filing fee. 13 A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a 14 United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4.

(b)(1)(B); 15 D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo 16 determination of those portions to which objections are made if the Magistrate Judge’s findings 17 and recommendations concern matters that may not be finally determined by a magistrate 18 judge. D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the 19 findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge.

(b)(1); D. Nev. R. 20 IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct “any 21 review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn,

140, 149 (1985) (citing

(b)(1)). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a 23 district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s R&R where no objections have been 24 filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna–Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003). 25 No objections to the R&R were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. (See R&R, 1 || ECF No.4) (setting a December 27, 2024, deadline for objections). Nor have Plaintiffs 2 complied with the Court’s Order, (ECF No. 3), by filing new IFP applications or paying the 3 || filing fee. 4 Accordingly, 5 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 4), is 6 || ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs’ case is DISMISSED in its entirety 8 || without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is kindly directed to close the case. 9 10 Dated this 29 day of January, 2025. y, 12 Mar . Gloria M/ANavarro, District Judge 13 United fa s District Court 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25

Page 2 of 2