1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA JOHNNY LEE JONES IT, Case No.: 2:24-cv-01039-APG-NJK 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 13] JOHN DOE #1, et al., 7 Defendants 8 On January 14, 2025, Magistrate Judge Koppe recommended that I dismiss this case because plaintiff Johnny Lee Jones III did not file an amended complaint by the given deadline. ECF No. 13. Jones did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the 11}|report and recommendation.

(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Koppe’s report and recommendation No. 13) is accepted, and this case is dismissed without prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 19 DATED this 30th day of January, 2025. 20 a ANDREWP.GORDON. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

23