Correa v. Booth
Correa v. Booth
Trial Court Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA ANTHONY CORREA, Case No. 2:24-cv-02409-JAD-NJK 6 Plaintiff, y. Order [Docket No. 11] 8] OFFICER KYLE BOOTH, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 Pending before the Court is a stipulation to exchange discovery documents by electronic means. Docket No. 11. Unless doing so interferes with Court deadlines or proceedings, parties are generally permitted to stipulate to discovery procedures without obtaining judicial approval. 13]| Fed. R. Civ. P. 29; see also Comminey v. Sam’s W. Inc.,
2020 WL 2764610, *1 (D. Nev. May 27, 14] 2020). The pending stipulation fails to explain why Court approval is necessary in this instance. 15] Accordingly, the stipulation is DENIED as unnecessary. 16 IT IS SO ORDERED. 17 Dated: February 13, 2025 18 7, < S — Nancy J. K 19 United States Magistrate Judge 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown