Scott v. Michell
Trial Court Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 kee 4 JAMES EDWARD SCOTT, III, Case No. 3:23-CV-00231-ART-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO 6 y MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MELISSA MICHELL, et a/., ° Defendants.
10 On January 21, 2025, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 38.) Plaintiff was given notice of the motion pursuant to the requirements of Klingele v. Ejikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9" Cir. 1988), and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9" Cir. 1998) (ECF No. 42). To date, Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition.
14 The Court will sua sponte grant Plaintiff one extension of time to March 14, 2025, | to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. No further extensions of time | shall be granted. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition, the motion will be submitted to the | court for decision.
18 IT IS SO ORDERED.
19 DATED. February 14, 2025 20 .
21 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.