1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA MATTHEW MULLINS, Case No.: 2:24-cv-00727-APG-DJA 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 10] SAMANTHA POWERS, et al., 7 Defendants 8 On January 31, 2025, Magistrate Judge Albregts recommended that I dismiss this case 9] with prejudice because plaintiff Matthew Mullins has been unable to successfully state a claim 10}| despite repeated attempts. ECF No. 10. Mullins did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation.

(b)(1) (requiring 12}| district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified 13} proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Albregts’ report and recommendation No. 10) is accepted and plaintiff Matthew Mullins’ third amended complaint (ECF No. 9) dismissed with prejudice. The clerk of court is instructed to close this case. 19 DATED this 20th day of February, 2025. 20 OIE a ANDREWP.GORDON. CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

23