Kumar v. Tata Consultancy Services Limited

2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4|| Selva Kumar, Case No.: 2:24-cv-02256-CDS-EJY 5 Plaintiff Order Denying as Moot Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss or, in the alternative, v. Motion to Compel Arbitration 7|| Tata Consultancy Services Limited, 8 Defendant [ECF Nos. 9, 11] 10 Plaintiff Selva Kumar filed a first amended complaint on February 5, 2025. ECF No. 13.

11} Because an amended complaint supersedes the original complaint in its entirety, defendant Tata 12] Consultancy Services Limited’s motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, motion to compel 13}| arbitration [ECF No. 9] targeting the original pleading is deemed moot. Ramirez Cnty. of San Bernadino, 806 F.3d 1002, 1009 (9th Cir. 2015). Further, because Tata has filed a motion to compel 15] arbitration (ECF No. 18), its motion to dismiss or, in the alternative, motion to compel 16]| arbitration [ECF No. 1] is also denied as moot. *\ 17 Dated: March 5, 2025 J, / , ke _— ve rates District Judge 20 /