Victory v. Flangas Frizzell Law Firm

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA JUSTIN LYNN VICTORY, Plaintiff, Case No.: 2:24-cv-02102-GMN-BNW vs. 6 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND FLANGAS FRIZZELL LAW FIRM, et al., RECOMMENDATION Defendants.

9 Pending before the Court is the Report and Recommendation (“R&R”), (ECF No. 6), of United States Magistrate Judge Brenda Weksler, which recommends dismissing this case due to Plaintiff’s failure to file an amended complaint by the court-ordered deadline. (See generally R&R). After the first court-ordered deadline passed, the Magistrate Judge gave Plaintiff an extension and warned that if he did not file an amended complaint by January 29, 2025, his case may be dismissed. (Id.). As of the date of this Order, Plaintiff has neither filed an amended complaint nor moved for an extension of time to do so.

16 A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a United States Magistrate Judge made pursuant to Local Rule IB 1-4. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2. Upon the filing of such objections, the Court must make a de novo determination of those portions to which objections are made if the Magistrate Judge’s findings and recommendations concern matters that may not be finally determined by a magistrate judge. D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). The Court may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); D. Nev. R. IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, the Court is not required to conduct “any review at all . . . of any issue that is not the subject of an objection.” Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 25 140, 149 (1985) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Indeed, the Ninth Circuit has recognized that a || district court is not required to review a magistrate judge’s R&R where no objections have been || filed. See, e.g., United States v. Reyna—Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1122 (9th Cir. 2003).

3 Here, no objections were filed, and the deadline to do so has passed. (See R&R, ECF || No. 6) (setting March 6, 2025, deadline for objections).

5 Accordingly, 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation, (ECF No. 6), is || ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full, and the action is DISMISSED without prejudice.

8 The Clerk of Court is kindly requested to close this case.

9 Dated this 13) day of March, 2025.

10 if, iy 4, Gloria /M. Navarro, District Judge 12 Clef) States District Court Page 2 of 2