1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA RYNE M. SEETO, Case No.: 2:25-cv-00542-APG-NJK 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation and Dismissing Case v. [ECF No. 3] NEVADA HIGHWAY PATROL, et al., 7 Defendants 8 On March 25, 2025, Magistrate Judge Koppe recommended that I dismiss plaintiff Ryne Seeto’s complaint because it is duplicative of an earlier-filed action in this court. ECF No. 3. Seeto did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and 11} }recommendation.

(b)(1) (requiring district courts to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia,

(9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (“the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)). 16 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Koppe’s report and recommendation 17|| (ECF No. 3) is accepted and plaintiff Ryne Seeto’s complaint in this case is dismissed as 18} duplicative of the complaint in 2:25-cv-00519-CDS-NJK. The clerk of court is instructed to 19}! close this case. 20 DATED this Ist day of May, 2025. 21 OIE ANDREWP.GORDON. 3 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE