Hayes v. Russell Road Food and Beverage, LLC

4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA JOSELYN MOORE, et al., 7 Case No. 2:24-cv-02341-CDS-NJK Plaintiffs, 8 Order v. 9 [Docket No. 29] RUSSELL ROAD FOOD AND 10] BEVERAGE, LLC., et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court is the parties’ proposed joint discovery plan. Docket No. 29.

13 The parties propose that discovery “shall be suspended until after the decision of the Court 14} on the [m]otion for [c]onditional [c]ertification.” Docket No. 29 at 4. The Court construes this as 15] a request to stay discovery; however, the parties fail to address the pertinent standards.

16 Accordingly, the pending discovery plan is DENIED without prejudice. Docket No. 29.

17] If the parties seek a stay of discovery, they must file, by May 19, 2025, a request addressing the 18] pertinent standards. See Kor Media Grp., LLC v. Green, 294 F.R.D. 579, 581 (D. Nev. 2013). If 19] the parties do not seek a stay of discovery, they must file a proper joint discovery plan and 20] scheduling order, no later than May 19, 2025.

21 IT IS SO ORDERED.

22 Dated: May 12, 2025 .

Raney J “Oppe 24 United States\Magistrate Judge