Tierra Lloyd v. Kering Group

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA TIERRA LLOYD, Case No.: 2:24-cv-02209-APG-BNW 4 Plaintiff Order Accepting Report and Recommendation v. [ECF No. 16] 6]| KERING GROUP and GUCCI AMERICA INC., Defendant 9 On April 30, 2025, Magistrate Judge Weksler recommended that I dismiss this case 10}| without prejudice because plaintiff Tierra Lloyd has not served the defendants by the given deadline. ECF No. 16. Lloyd did not object. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo 12}|review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to 13}| “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made”); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) (‘the district judge must review the magistrate judge’s findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise” (emphasis in original)).

17 I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Weksler’s report and recommendation (ECF No. 16) is accepted, plaintiff Tierra Lloyd’s complaint (ECF No. 1) is dismissed without prejudice for failure to timely serve, and the clerk of court is instructed to close this case.

20 DATED this 15th day of May, 2025. n ae ANDREW P. GORDON 3 CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE