1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * *

7 KENNETH R. TIPPY JR., Case No. 2:24-cv-01364-RFB-DJA

8 Plaintiff, ORDER

9 v.

10 ALPHA PLEXUS LLC., 11 Defendants. 12

13 14 Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 11) of the 15 Honorable Daniel J. Albregts, entered on January 27, 2025. A district court “may accept, reject, or 16 modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.” 28 U.S.C. 17 § 636(b)(1). A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of 18 a magistrate judge.

(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have 19 been filed the district court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the 20 report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.” 28 U.S.C. 21 § 636(b)(1); see also Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court 22 is not required to conduct “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations 23 of a magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn,

(1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), 24 objections were due by February 10, 2025. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed 25 the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// ] Therefore, IT IS ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 4) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. 3 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The 4| Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 5 6 DATED: May 29, 2025. 7 8 At 9 RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

-2-