1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 7 CALEB LINDSEY. Case No. 2:25-cv-01027-RFB-NJK Plaintiff(s), 8 Order Vv. 9 [Docket No. 1] 10 ee COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT, et

11 Defendant(s). 12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis. Docket 13] No. 1. Plaintiff's application is incomplete as no information is provided as to questions 5 or 8. Moreover, the financial situation portrayed in the application is a logical impossibility, as the 15] identified expenses greatly exceed the identified income. Hence, it is not clear whether Plaintiff 16] has some other source of income, such as from the employment of a spouse. Cf Flores v. Colvin, 17]

, at *3-4 (D. Nev. May 22, 2014) (collecting cases that the in forma 18] pauperis analysis evaluates all income and assets to which the plaintiff has access, including those 19] of a spouse). 20 Accordingly, the application to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED without prejudice. 21|| The Clerk’s Office is INSTRUCTED to send Plaintiff a copy of the long form in forma pauperis 22|| application for non-prisoners. Plaintiff must answer all questions in this long form application and 23] must file the completed application by June 30, 2025. Failing to comply with this order may result 24|| in a recommendation that this case be dismissed. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: June 16, 2025

28 Unite ORR. gistrate Judge