1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA

National Specialty Pharmacy LLC, Case No. 2:25-cv-00295-CDS-MDC 5 Plaintiff Dismissal of Defendant Maybelline Sana

7|| Maybelline Sana, [ECF No. 36] 8 Defendant 9 10 Plaintiff National Specialty Pharmacy LLC stipulates to voluntarily dismiss defendant 11] Maybelline Sana from this action. ECF No. 36. “The plaintiff may dismiss some or all of the defendants, or some or all of his claims, through a Rule 41(a)(1) notice,” and the dismissal “automatically terminates the action as to the defendants who are the subjects of the notice.” Wilson v. City of San Jose,

, 692 (9th Cir. 1997). Rule 41(a) is clear that the entry of such dismissal is effective automatically and does not require judicial approval. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A) (ii); see also Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co.,

, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999). Because the parties have filed a stipulation of dismissal that is signed by all whom have made an 18|| appearance, defendant Maybelline Sana is terminated. Consequently, Sana’s motion to dismiss 19]| [ECF No. 20] and motion to grant her motion to dismiss [RCE No. 27] are DENIED as moot. 20 Dated: June 27, 2025 /, / 21 LZ 22 Crist}: aD. va 53 njeed States District Judge Ly 24 25 26