1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 * * * 6 GERMAN GONZALEZ, Case No. 2:24-cv-02387-RFB-DJA 7 Plaintiff, ORDER 8 v. 9 CLARK COUNTY DETENTION CENTER, 10 Defendant. 11 12 Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 4) of the 13 Honorable Judge Daniel J. Albregts, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on May 6, 2025. 14 A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or 15 recommendations made by the magistrate.”

(b)(1). A party may file specific 16 written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge.

(b) 17 (1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is 18 required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified 19 proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.”

(b)(1); see 20 also Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not 21 required to conduct “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of 22 a magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn,

(1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), 23 objections were due by May 20, 2025. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed 24 the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. 25 /// 26 /// 27 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 4) is 28 ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. 2 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice. 3 The Clerk of Court is instructed to close this matter accordingly. 4 5 6 DATED: July 2, 2025. tS 8 RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

_2-