1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 TARISHA SHARNEE JACKSON, 5 Case No.: 2:25-cv-00537-CDS-NJK Plaintiff, 6 Order v. 7 [Docket No. 35] GEICO CHOICE INSURANCE COMPANY, 8] etal., 9 Defendants. 10 Pending before the Court is the parties’ stipulation to extend case management deadlines 11} by 45 days. Docket No. 35. 12 A request to extend unexpired deadlines in the scheduling order must be premised on a 13] showing of good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4); Local Rule 26-3. The good cause analysis turns 14] on whether the subject deadlines cannot reasonably be met despite the exercise of diligence. 15] Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.,

(9th Cir. 1992).! 16 A request to extend case management deadlines must provide a “statement specifying the 17|| discovery completed.” Local Rule 26-3. To allow the Court to make a proper determination of 18] whether the parties have been diligent throughout the discovery period, this statement must include 19] the dates on which all discovery occurred. Such information is absent here. See Docket No. 35 at 20] 2. Therefore, the Court cannot determine whether the parties have been diligent. 21 Accordingly, the stipulation is DENIED without prejudice. Docket No. 35. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 Dated: July 10, 2025 24 ALS ' Nancy J\Koppe 25 ‘United’States Magistrate Judge 26) ————__"DW@/»/_> ' That a request is jointly submitted “neither mandates allowance of the extension sought 27] nor exempts parties from making the necessary showings to justify that relief. Failure to provide such showings may result in denial of a stipulated request to extend the case management 28] deadlines.” Williams v. James River Grp. Inc.,

, 1178 (D. Nev. 2022).