Giannone v. Nevada Property 1, LLC

District Court, D. Nevada

Giannone v. Nevada Property 1, LLC

Trial Court Opinion

1

2

3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5

6 JOSEPH MICHAEL GIANNONE, Case No. 2:24-cv-00627-NJK 7 Plaintiff(s), Order 8 v. [Docket No. 49] 9 NEVADA PROPERTY 1, LLC, 10 Defendant(s). 11 Pending before the Court is a stipulation to extend the joint proposed pretrial order deadline 12 by another 60 days. Docket No. 49. 13 A request to extend unexpired deadlines in the scheduling order must be premised on a 14 showing of good cause. Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4); Local Rule 26-3. The good cause analysis turns 15 on whether the subject deadlines cannot reasonably be met despite the exercise of diligence. 16 Johnson v. Mammoth Recreations, Inc.,

975 F.2d 604, 609

(9th Cir. 1992). “[I]t is well-settled 17 that the existence of settlement talks or the potential for alternative dispute resolution is not, 18 standing alone, sufficient to establish good cause for an extension of the case management 19 deadlines.” Williams v. James River Grp. Inc.,

627 F. Supp. 3d 1172

, 1181 (D. Nev. 2022) 20 (collecting cases). Modification of the case management schedule on that basis generally requires 21 consideration of additional circumstances. See

id.

at 1181 n.8.1 22 The instant stipulation is centered on the fact that Defendant’s new counsel continues to 23 evaluate the case and coordinate with Defendant regarding settlement and a potential second 24 mediation. Docket No. 49 at 3.2 Counsel appeared more than two months ago, Docket No. 47, 25

26 1 For example, the Court is much more inclined to allow such relief when “a concrete date is set in the relative near-term by which the settlement discussions or alternative dispute resolution 27 will be completed.”

Id.

28 2 The parties already participated in a mediation last year. See id. at 2. 1} and the parties have been discussing settlement and a second potential mediation for some time, Docket No. 42 at 3; Docket No. 48 at 2. Given the circumstances, the Court will provide a 14-day 3] extension at this time. If the parties seek more time for a mediation, any renewed stipulation must 4] provide a concrete date on which that mediation is set and must address the other specific 5], considerations to support that request. See Williams, 627 F. Supp. 3d at 1181 n.8. 6 Accordingly, the stipulation to extend is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The 7| deadline to file the joint proposed pretrial order is EXTENDED to August 5, 2025. 8 IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 Dated: July 17, 2025 . 10 7. ae x... Nancy J. Koppe, 1] United States Magistrate Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Reference

Status
Unknown