Bliss v. Bondi

District Court, D. Nevada

Bliss v. Bondi

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA * * *

DAVID BLISS, Case No. 2:25-cv-00763-RFB-EJY

Plaintiff, ORDER v.

PAM BONDI, et al.

Defendants.

Before the Court for consideration is the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 3) of the Honorable Elena J. Youcha, United States Magistrate Judge, entered on May 5, 2025. A district court “may accept, reject, or modify, in whole or in part, the findings or recommendations made by the magistrate.”

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1). A party may file specific written objections to the findings and recommendations of a magistrate judge.

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); Local Rule IB 3-2(a). When written objections have been filed, the district court is required to “make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings or recommendations to which objection is made.”

28 U.S.C. § 636

(b)(1); see also Local Rule IB 3-2(b). Where a party fails to object, however, a district court is not required to conduct “any review,” de novo or otherwise, of the report and recommendations of a magistrate judge. Thomas v. Arn,

474 U.S. 140, 149

(1985). Pursuant to Local Rule IB 3-2(a), objections were due by September 19, 2024. No objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the record in this case and concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. /// /// IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 3) is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without leave to amend. The Clerk of Court is instructed to close this matter accordingly.

DATED: July 25, 2025

RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Reference

Status
Unknown