Thomas v. Burchowitz

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 kok ok 4 CALLANDRA THOMAS, Case No. 2:25-cv-00999-JAD-EJY 5 Plaintiff, 6 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND v. RECOMMENDATION AND DISMISSIN | DAVID BURCHOWITZ, et al., CASE 8 Defendants.

10 On July 10, 2025, the magistrate judge entered this report and recommendation [ECF No. 4]: 11 This action was initiated on June 26, 2025 when Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, submitted < || Application to Proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”) together with a Complaint. ECF Nos. 1, 1-1. © |} June 10, 2025, the Court granted Plaintiffs IFP request and dismissed her Complaint witho |} prejudice but with leave to amend no later than July 7, 2025. ECF No. 3. The Court explained | || Plaintiff that failure to comply with the Order would result in a recommendation to dismiss th |} action in its entirety. /d. As of the date of this Recommendation, Plaintiff has not complied wi || the Court’s Order; nor has she otherwise communicated with the Court.

18 Accordingly, and based on the foregoing, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this matt || be dismissed without prejudice for failure to comply with the Court’s Order.

DATED this 10th day of July, 2025.

22 ELAYNAJ. YOUGHAH 53 UNITED STATES MAG TE JUDGE 95 ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION 26 The deadline for any party to object to this recommendation was July 24, 2025, and r || party filed anything or asked to extend the deadline to do so. “[N]o review is required of || magistrate judge’s report and recommendation unless objections are filed.” United States v. || Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003). Having reviewed the report and || recommendation, I find good cause to adopt it, and I do. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that th || Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation [ECF No. 4] is ADOPTED in its entirety, and || this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to ENTER || JUDGMENT accordingly and CLOSE THIS CASE. g U.S. District A e A Dorsey 9 Dated: July 28, 2025 1]