District Court, D. Nevada, 2025

Johnson v. Zuffa, LLC dba Ultimate Fighting Championship

Johnson v. Zuffa, LLC dba Ultimate Fighting Championship
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided August 1, 2025
Johnson v. Zuffa, LLC dba Ultimate Fighting Championship

Trial Court Opinion

1 || PETER S. CHRISTIANSEN, ESQ.

Nevada Bar No. 5254 || [email protected] KEELY P. CHIPPOLETTI, ESQ.

3 || Nevada Bar No. 13931 [email protected] || CHRISTIANSEN TRIAL LAWYERS 710 South 7" Street, Suite B || Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 Telephone: (702) 240-7979 || Facsimile: (866) 412-6992 || Attorneys for Nonparty g Dominance MMA, LLC 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA !T || KAJAN JOHNSON, CLARENCE || DOLLAWAY, and TRISTAN CONNELLY, on | CASE NO. 2:21~cv-01189-RFB-BNW behalf of themselves and all others similarly = 13 || situated; Plaintiff, STIPULATION AND ORDER TO || Vs. EXTEND DEADLINE FOR NONPARTY DOMINANCE MMA, || ZUFFA, LLC, TKO OPERATING COMPANY, | LLC TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO | LLC f/k/a Zuffa Parent, LLC (d/b/a Ultimate COMPEL [ECF No. 216] || Fighting Championship and UFC), and ENDEAVOR HOLDINGS, INC., .

18 (First Request) Defendants.

20 Plaintiffs, Kajan Johnson, Clarence Dollaway and Tristan Connelly (“Plaintiffs”), an || Nonparty, Dominance MMA, LLC (“Dominance”), by and through their undersigned counsel a || record, hereby stipulate as follows: 23 1. Plaintiffs filed a motion to compel against Nonparty Dominance (ECF No. 216) || with a current deadline for response set for August 6, 2025.

25 2. The parties have conferred and agreed to a one-week extension of time fo || Dominance to file its response to the motion to compel.

27 3. Accordingly, the deadline for Dominance to respond to the motion shall b || extended from August 6, 2025, to August 13, 2025.

] 4. Good cause exists for this extension because Counsel for Dominance require || additional time to prepare a complete and accurate response due to (1) the volume of the issue ||raised in the motion, (11) the need to coordinate with Dominance, which is not a litigant in th || underlying case, and (111) previously scheduled obligations and deadlines in other matters. Th ||requested extension will allow for more efficient resolution of the issues and may facilitat || narrowing the dispute.

7 5. This is the first request to extend Dominance’s response deadline.

8 6. The requested extension is made in good faith and not for the purpose of delay.

9 Dated this 1st day of August, 2025. | 10 Respectfully Submitted By: Approved as to Form and Content: || CHRISTIANSEN TRIAL LAWYERS JOSEPH SAVERI LAW FIRM, LLP > 12 || /s/ Keely P. Chippoletti /s/ Kevin E. Rayhill = < 13 PETER S. CHRISTIANSEN, ESQ. KEVIN E. RAYHILL, ESQ. (Pro Hac Vice) 4 14 || Nevada Bar No. 5254 ITAK MORADI, ESQ. (Pro Hac Vice) KEELY P. CHIPPOLETTI, ESQ. 601 California Street, Suite 1505 || Nevada Bar No. 13931 San Francisco, CA 94108 || 710 South 7th Street | Las Vegas, NV 89101 Attorneys for Plaintiffs and the Proposed Cla: Attorneys for Nonparty 18]! Dominance MMA, LLC 20 ORDER 7] The Court, having reviewed the parties’ stipulation and good cause appearing, hereb 972 |}ORDERS that deadline for Nonparty Dominance MMA, LLC to file a response to Plaintiffs || motion to compel (ECF No. 216) shall be extended to August 13, 2025.

24 IT IS SO ORDERED.

26 RICHARD F. BOULWARE, II 07 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: This □□□ day of August, 2025.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.