Brown v. Royal
Brown v. Royal
Trial Court Opinion
1
2
3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5 Case No. 3:25-cv-00052-MMD-CLB DEION BROWN, 6 ORDER Petitioner, 7 v.
8 TERRY ROYAL, et al.,
9 Respondents.
10 11 Following the Notice of Appearance (ECF No. 13) by the Federal Public Defender 12 on behalf of Petitioner Deion Brown, it is hereby ordered: 13 1. The Federal Public Defender, through Ron Y. Sung, Esq., is appointed as counsel 14 for Petitioner pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(a)(2)(B). Counsel will represent 15 Petitioner in all federal proceedings related to this matter, including any appeals or 16 certiorari proceedings, unless allowed to withdraw. 17 2. Petitioner will have until November 3, 2025 to file an amended petition and/or seek 18 other appropriate relief. This deadline and any extension thereof may not be 19 construed as implied findings regarding the federal limitation period or a basis for 20 tolling. Petitioner at all times remains responsible for calculating the running of the 21 federal limitation period and timely asserting claims without regard to any court- 22 ordered deadlines or extensions. Thus, a petition or amended petition filed within 23 a court-ordered deadline may still be dismissed as untimely if it violates the statute 24 of limitations. See Sossa v. Diaz,
729 F.3d 1225, 1235(9th Cir. 2013). 25 3. Respondents must file a response to the amended petition, including potentially by 26 motion to dismiss, within 60 days of service of the amended petition. Petitioner 27 may file a reply within 30 days of service of the answer. However, LR 7-2(b) 28 governs the response and reply time to any motion filed by either party, including 1 motions filed in lieu of a pleading. 2 4. Any procedural defenses Respondents raise to the counseled amended petition 3 must be raised together in a single, consolidated motion to dismiss. Successive 4 motions to dismiss will not be entertained, and any procedural defenses omitted 5 from the consolidated motion to dismiss will be waived. Respondents may not file 6 a response that consolidates their procedural defenses, if any, with their response 7 on the merits. But arguments that an unexhausted claim clearly lacks merit may 8 be included a procedural defense response. If Respondents seek dismissal of 9 unexhausted claims under
28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(2), they must: (1) do so in a single 10 motion to dismiss, not in the answer; and (2) direct their argument, specifically, to 11 the standard for dismissal under § 2254(b)(2) as set forth in Cassett v. Stewart, 12
406 F.3d 614, 623-24(9th Cir. 2005). In short, no procedural defenses, including 13 exhaustion, may be included with the merits in an answer. All procedural defenses, 14 including exhaustion, must be raised in a single motion to dismiss. 15 5. In any answer filed on the merits, Respondents must specifically cite to and 16 address the applicable state court written decision and state court record materials, 17 if any, regarding each claim within the response as to that claim. 18 6. Respondents must file the state court exhibits relevant to their response in 19 chronological order. 20 7. All state court records and related exhibits must be filed in accordance with LR IA 21 10-3 and LR IC 2-2 and include a separate index identifying each exhibit by number 22 or letter. The index must be filed in CM/ECF’s document upload screen as the base 23 document to receive the base docket number (e.g., ECF No. 10). Each exhibit must 24 then be filed as “attachments” to the base document to receive a sequenced sub- 25 docket number (e.g., Exhibit A (ECF No. 10-1), Exhibit B (ECF No. 10-2), Exhibit 26 C (ECF No. 10-3), and so forth). If the exhibits will span more than one filing, the 27 base document in each successive filing must be either a copy of the index or 28 volume cover page. See LR IC 2-2(a)(3)(A). 1 8. Notwithstanding LR IC 2-2(g), paper copies of any electronically filed exhibits need 2 not be provided to chambers or to the staff attorney unless later directed by the 3 Court. 4 DATED THIS 5" Day of August 2025.
6 MIRANDAM.DU 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Reference
- Status
- Unknown