District Court, D. Nevada, 2025

Ramirez v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Ramirez v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada · Decided September 12, 2025
Ramirez v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc.

Trial Court Opinion

1 Jennifer L. Braster Nevada Bar No. 9982 NAYLOR & BRASTER 10100 W Charleston Blvd, Suite 120 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 (T) (702) 420-7000 (F) (702) 420-7001 [email protected] Attorneys for Defendant EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 DISTRICT OF NEVADA ARTURO RAMIREZ, Case No. 2:25-cv-01460-JCM-NJK 12 Plaintiff, DEFENDANT EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC. 13 v. AND PLAINTIFF’S FIRST STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, ANSWER COMPLAINT INC., EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES, LLC, and TRANS UNION LLC, Complaint filed: August 7, 2025 16 Defendants.

Defendant Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (“Experian”) and Plaintiff Arturo Ramirez (“Plaintiff”), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby submit this stipulation pursuant to LR IA 6-1 to extend the time for Experian to respond to Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No. 1).

Plaintiff filed his Complaint on August 7, 2025. (ECF No. 1.). The parties respectfully request an extension through October 2, 2025, to file Experian’s responsive pleading. This first extension will allow Experian an opportunity to investigate the facts of the case and to avoid the incurrence of additional attorneys’ fees when this matter may be resolved shortly. Plaintiff and Experian stipulate and agree that Experian shall have an extension until October 2, 2025, to file its responsive pleading. This is Experian’s first request for an extension of time to respond to the || Complaint and is not intended to cause any delay or prejudice any party, but to permit both Plaintiff || and Experian an opportunity to more fully investigate the claims alleged.

4 || ITIS SO STIPULATED.

5 || Dated this 11th of September, 2025.

NAYLOR & BRASTER LAW OFFICES OF CRAIG FRIEDBERG, 7 ESQ.

8 By: /s/ Jennifer L. Braster By: Ls/ James M, Smith 9 Jennifer L. Braster Craig Friedberg Nevada Bar No. 9982 Nevada Bar No. 4606 10 10100 W Charleston Blvd, Suite 120 4760 South Pecos Road, Suite 103 Las Vegas, Nevada 89135 Las Vegas, Nevada 89121 11 Attorneys for Defendant James M. Smith (pro hac vice to be 12 Experian Information Solutions, Inc. submitted) Doherty Smith, LLC 13 7000 W. 127" Street Palos Heights, IL 60463 Attorney for Plaintiff 15 Arturo Ramirez 16 NO FURTHER EXTENSIONS WILL BE GRANTED.

18 IT IS SO ORDERED.

19 || Dated September 12, 2025 □ 20 Z ANS x.

UNITED STATES,MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 —— □ 28 EXPERIAN’S STIPULATION TO EXTEND 2 TIME TO ANSWER COMPLAINT

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.