Attorney General 2 DOUGLAS R. RANDS (Bar No. 3572) Senior Deputy Attorney General 3 State of Nevada Office of the Attorney General 4 100 N. Carson Street Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717 5 (775) 684-1150 (phone) Email: [email protected] 6 7 Attorneys for Defendants Adam Main, Francisco Barrios, and William Miller 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 DIONDRAE PARKER, Case No. 3:24-cv-00129-MMD-CLB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING 13 v. UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE 14 BRANDON STUBBS, et al., RESPONSE TO DISCOVERY 15 Defendants. [ECF No. 32] 16 Defendants Adam Main, Francisco Barrios, and William Miller by and through 17 counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Nevada Attorney General, and Douglas R. Rands, Senior Deputy 18 Attorney General, of the State of Nevada, Office of the Attorney General, hereby submit 19 their Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to File Response to Discovery. 20 Defendants seek an extension of time from September 26, 2025 to October 27, 2025. 21 I. INTRODUCTION 22 Defendants respectfully request this Court grant their request to extend the 23 deadline to file the response to Plaintiff’s Request for Production of Documents. The parties 24 conducted a meet and confer telephone conference on September 25, 2025, wherein the 25 parties agreed to a 30-day extension of time to file the response. This was primarily because 26 of the ongoing cyber event. The files of the Office of the Attorney General remain 27 inaccessible. Therefore the documents necessary to fulfill the requests are not available. 28 /// 2 cause exists to grant the instant motion for extension of time. 3 II. LEGAL ARGUMENT 4 District courts have inherent power to control their dockets. Hamilton Copper & 5 Steel Corp. v. Primary Steel, Inc.,

(9th Cir. 1990); Oliva v. Sullivan, 6

(9th Cir. 1992). Rule 6(b)(1), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, governs 7 extensions of time: 8 When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the court may, for good cause, extend the time: (A) with or without 9 motion or notice if the court acts, or if a request is made, before 10 the original time or its extension expires; or (B) on motion made after the time has expired if the party failed to act because of 11 excusable neglect. 12 “The proper procedure, when additional time for any purpose is needed, is to present 13 to the Court a timely request for an extension before the time fixed has expired (i.e., a 14 request presented before the time then fixed for the purpose in question has expired).” 15 Canup v. Miss. Valley Barge Line Co.,

(D. Pa. 1962). The Canup Court 16 explained that “the practicalities of life” (such as an attorney’s “conflicting professional 17 engagements” or personal commitments such as vacations, family activities, illnesses, or 18 death) often necessitate an enlargement of time to comply with a court deadline.

19 Because of the ongoing cyber event, the files of the Office of the Attorney General 20 remain inaccessible. Therefore the documents necessary to fulfill the requests are not 21 available. Mr. Parker agreed to the filing of an unopposed motion. Accordingly, good cause 22 exists for an extension of time. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 CONCLUSION 2 Defendants’ unopposed motion for an extension of time should be granted. 3 || Defendants request an extension from the current due date of September 26 to October 4 2025. This motion is brought in good faith and not for the purposes of delay. 5 DATED this 25th day of September, 2025. 6 AARON D. FORD 7 Attorney General By: _/s/ Douglas R. Rands 8 DOUGLAS R. RANDS (Bar No. 3572) 9 Senior Deputy Attorney General

10 Attorneys for Defendants 11 || tT Is SO ORDERED. 12 || DATED: September 25, 2025 13 * 14 15 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28