1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 6 * * *

7 GEORGE MYOTT, Case No.2:24-CV-57 JCM (NJK)

8 Plaintiff(s), ORDER 9 v.

10 LEADING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT LLC, 11 Defendant(s). 12

13 Presently before the court is the matter of Myott v. Leading Technology Development, LLC, 14 case number 2:24-cv-00057-JCM-NJK. 15 16 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b) provides that “[i]f the plaintiff fails to prosecute or 17 to comply with these rules or a court order, a defendant may move to dismiss the action or any 18 claim against it.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). This court also has the inherent power to sua sponte 19 dismiss a case for want of prosecution or compliance with court orders. Link v. Wabash R. Co., 20

, 630–31 (1962); Pagtalunan v. Galaza,

, 640–43 (9th Cir. 2002); Ferdik 21 22 v. Bonzelet,

(9th Cir. 1992). 23 This inherent power is also codified in this court’s local rules. Local Rule 41-1 provides 24 that “[a]ll civil actions that have been pending in this court for more than 270 days without any 25 proceeding of record having been taken may, after notice, be dismissed for want of prosecution by 26 the court sua sponte or on the motion of an attorney or pro se party.” LR 41-1. 27 28 . . . 1 On February 19, 2025, the court notified the parties that “[i]f no action is taken in this case 2 within 30 days, the Court will enter an order of dismissal for want of prosecution.” (ECF No. 23). 3 No action has been taken since. 4 Accordingly, 5 6 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that this matter be, and the 7 same hereby is, DISMISSED for want of prosecution. 8 The clerk shall close this case. 9 DATED October 1, 2025. 10

11 ______________________________________________ 12 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28